Trüki | Artikli juurde

[1-10]  [11-20]   [21-30]   [31-39]   Eesti ühiskond Kanadas ja Torontos on üles ehitatud sadade ja tuhandete eestlaste vabatahtliku tööjôuga ja paljude vabatahtliku majandusliku panusega siinsele eesti ühiskonnale. Paljud on seda isikliku majandusliku riskiga teinud. Tundub uskumatuna, et üks meie ühiskonna liige nüüd ahnitseb omale nende pingutuste kaudu loodud varandusest veerand miljonit dollarit! Selle kohta ei oska öelda midagi muud kui: häbi häbi ja häbi!! You should feel ashamed to be writing this against an Estonian who was terminated WITHOUT CAUSE!.

We do not know the whole story so we should not judge either side.

You should be pleading with the EAK to settle this dispute and SAVE the donated funds and focus on running Ehatare.

The only people who will win anything are lawyers via their fees..

Money down the drain.for nothing.

There are many seniors who live at Ehatare and they are happy living there... but those same people were shocked at the termination of a popular long term employee.

One should not have to choose sides here. Whatever the reason for the termination - it is NOT worth the legal defense using donated money to fight it.

Habi teile... for even asking an Estonian that was dismissed without cause, who is requesting some sort of explanation or justice to just walk away.

EAK should just walk away from this fight and say "sorry"

EAK could make us all proud and admit to a politically incorrect defense. You should feel ashamed to be writing this against an Estonian who was terminated WITHOUT CAUSE!.

We do not know the whole story so we should not judge either side.

You should be pleading with the EAK to settle this dispute and SAVE the donated funds and focus on running Ehatare.

The only people who will win anything are lawyers via their fees..

Money down the drain.for nothing.

There are many seniors who live at Ehatare and they are happy living there... but those same people were shocked at the termination of a popular long term employee.

One should not have to choose sides here. Whatever the reason for the termination - it is NOT worth the legal defense using donated money to fight it.

Habi teile... for even asking an Estonian that was dismissed without cause, who is requesting some sort of explanation or justice to just walk away.

EAK should just walk away from this fight and say "sorry"

EAK could make us all proud and admit to a politically incorrect defense. The terms "with cause" and "without cause" are legal terms.

Before mouthing off, you should investigate the distinction. Kompliment, härra Purje,
asjaliku referaadi ja sisuka kommentaari eest! Eerik on tore mees, aga ta EAK kokkuvõte jätab mulje, et oli rahulik ja tavaline koosolek. Minul jäi hoopis teine järeldus kui vaatasin samast koosolekust tehtud videot...

http://www.eesti.ca/index.php?... Ok... I looked it up... and I believe you are not very aware of reality.

I have directly heard from a board member that the employee was terminated without cause. Ok.. the person was not a lawyer... In other words the employee was not terminated because they did something wrong.. the employer just wanted to terminate the person.

Thus, how was my use or words incorrect. Please check your facts on the issue.

on the other hand while looking up the definition "without cause" the employer must give the employee enough notice and/or compensation.

This employee had no notice... and thus is entitled to compensation. Had you bothered to attend the 'special meeting', you'd know that the former employee was offered a compensation package exceeding what the law proscribes.
It was rejected! Veel parem!
http://www.eestielu.ca/et/arva... The past year has been brutal as people have been taking sides on an employment issue. Why intelligent folks would want to take sides without being apprised of the facts is puzzling? Remember here that the facts have by not been divulged by both sides. Hence, why judge? Given the confidentiality surrounding employment issues, let the employer and employee sort this out. Employment is all about doing a job, as required by an employer. It's not about Facebook pages and petition sites, which make the whole thing look tawdry. Much like a dance competition on television where viewers phone in their preferences?!?
[1-10]  [11-20]   [21-30]   [31-39]