Debate – Condemn Crimes of Communism - on Michael Coren Show
Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
A.N.14 Jun 2007 10:38
Väga hea!!! Go Laas, Go!!
JK14 Jun 2007 13:58
Too bad no one watches this Judeo-Christian fascist.
A.N.14 Jun 2007 20:08
He's hardnosed, but it should make for an interesting debate.
Anonymous15 Jun 2007 08:21
What debate?
Communism: Bad.
Christian Libertarians: Good.
Program: Boring.
I'll look for a rerun of MASH thanks.
Enlighten others15 Jun 2007 09:06
Typical for the sniping and comfortable non-active pseudoestos who comment on this site... OK, you are passive-aggressive, like many in the liberal-socialist welfare state... But, should you not maybe be thinking that it is good that communist crimes are being aired in public? - no matter what your opinion of the host? - ... someone at least is doing something to keep the topic in the public eye. Look what crypto-commie Putin is doing, without any significant censure, and then say with conviction that I'm better off watching Radar getting Major Burns from Hot Lips rather than being involved...
Anonymous15 Jun 2007 09:23
I'll give you that: He is keeping it in the public eye.
But the forum makes it sound like a Judeo-Christian crusade.
I'll stick to Klinger.
Illuminati15 Jun 2007 09:48
No surprise, as Klinger was/is Jewish.

Just like Karl Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin (Dzhugasvili, his original Georgian name, means son of Jew). ...Roosevelt was Jewish...Churchill ditto... In Canada at least two of the 20th century PMs.. figure it out..

FYI, Coren, born Jewish, claims to be born again Xtian... One world government can only be achieved by spreading dissension...
Maximus15 Jun 2007 10:33
WTF - why does Judaism always get brought up?
Q15 Jun 2007 11:32
WWJD? Or, better yet, what would Jesus say?
to maximius16 Jun 2007 10:10
pretty sick stuff!16 Jun 2007 12:27
"Eesti Elu jätab endale õiguse kustutada mistahes kommentaari." -- At least that's the way that the advertising goes. I wonder. What qualifies for erasure?
questions16 Jun 2007 19:53
.. and who initiated the 'crimes of communism' ? ... the killing of 40-100 million people is far more 'sick' than a posting that finds your disfavour, or do we prefer to cover up the truth ?
Maxim.17 Jun 2007 23:56
A significant number of communist crimes can easily be attributed to Estonians themselves, who simply "confessed" to knowing information about their neigbours activities, which was sufficiecnt evidence for their arrest. Estonians need to take ownership of their own crimes and deal with them in addition to finding criminals outside of their own race.
Anonymous14 Jun 2007 13:07
Apart from Laas, I'm unfamiliar with the participants.
What can we expect here? Something adversarial or collegial?
familiarize yourself15 Jun 2007 07:18
All four panellists attended the seminar on June 11, more about them in the article on EE ( Christine Chi Dang was the Vietnamese delegate there) A google on the two profs should also help. Sounds like it will be collegial, in other words
***17 Jun 2007 08:43
As pointed out by Robert Wilton in his book "The Last Days of the Romanovs" (1920) , the communist revolution was not an insurrection by Russians, but rather a secret invasion by Jews. Of 556 leading conspirators in the Bolshevik state in 1918-19 there were 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Latvians, 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns, one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews.
"The Black Book of Communism" (1999) is a must read for anyone who wants knowledge on this subject.
t18 Jun 2007 08:51
Some Jews were communists, so were some Estonians, some Russians, some Americans, etc. Some Jews have killed innocent people, but so have pretty much every other race, ethnicity and religious affiliation.

It doesn't make somebody antisemitist to point out that some Communist leaders happened to be jews. Although I am not sure about Stalin. Never heard about this (probably very few have, which makes it the perfect conspiracy).

I wonder if stating that Hitler was a German would be considered an anti-German comment?
tle19 Jun 2007 06:21
... for many reasons, peoples of many nations supported communism ... but it is important to remember who financed, created and led communism ...
Toomas Merilo20 Jun 2007 10:00
Adolf Hitler was born 20 April 1889 in Braunau am Inn, Austria. His father, Alois Hitler (born Schicklgruber) and mother, Klara Pölzl were Roman Catholic.

So saying he was German would indeed be anti-German?

Anybody see any other way of "connecting the dots"? My apologies in advance.
Maxim.20 Jun 2007 15:20
Toomas, I'm looking forward to seeing a rebuttal from you about Laaneotsas latest comments regarding the seriousness of Russia as a looming shadow desirous to reoccupy former colonies. You, the most positive thinker on cloud Canadajust cant' see anything but green lights flashing for Estonia, while some people have to carry the brunt of concern because of your lack of any! What's the point behind your latest comment?
Peter20 Jun 2007 23:07
Stalin was an Orthodox Georgian. The rumours that he was Jewish came from the Yiddish language press since Stalin understood this language but there is no evidence that he spoke Yiddish at home as was suggested. He probably learned this language in prison as is was widely spoken at that time among Russian revolutionaries.
Maxim.20 Jun 2007 23:52
It would be a shocking slur on Stalin to suggest he was mingling with fellow-travellers busy putting together the Protocols of the Elders...but chances are that the Protocols themselves are the work of the Bolsheviks, who were keen to deflect anything happening in Russia as being "their fault", and it was pretty sure that the Jews would be the best scapegoat for getting on with their own Messianic plans.
Question21 Jun 2007 14:27
Who were the Bolsheviks ?
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.