How Russia went wrong: an insider’s testimony (2)
Arvamus | 17 Sep 2017  | EWR
  FB   Tweet   Trüki    Comment   E-post
On Sept. 12, Vladimir Putin quietly passed a landmark date: He had spent 6,602 days as the top leader of Russia, The Washington Post notes today (September 14):

Putin has spent more time in office than Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, who ruled for 18 years and one month between 1964 and 1982 (6,601 days). It also means that Putin is now the longest-serving Russian leader since Joseph Stalin, who led the Soviet Union for almost three decades between 1924 and 1953 — 10,636 days in total.

In his new book, Russia’s Dead End: An Insider’s Testimony from Gorbachev to Putin, Andrei Kovalev says things that no outsider could about Russia’s “manic-depressive psychosis ….megalomania, persecution complex and kleptomania,” The Economist notes:

In the long run he fears a break-up of Russia, before—possibly—the dawn of democracy, the rule of law and modernisation….. Mr Putin is a “mumbling, stammering knock-kneed brow-furrowing ex-KGB agent who speaks the language of the gutter and values power above everything”.

Recent opposition gains are a troubling sign for the Kremlin, notes STRATFOR. Putin is almost assured an overwhelming victory, but his ability to hold onto his previous mandates are in question…… “At the end of the day, while there’s reason to hope that these results are a sign that change is possible, the stark reality remains that these small victories are likely all that the regime will permit,” adds Hudson Institute analyst Hannah Thoburn, a former Penn Kemble fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy…RTWT

Michael Allen
Special Assistant, Government Relations and Public Affairs
Editor, Democracy Digest
National Endowment for Democracy
 
  FB   Tweet   Trüki    Comment   E-post

Viimased kommentaarid

Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
where's the profit?19 Sep 2017 09:35
Defeating the Chechens and Georgians, and grabbing Crimea has done no good for you, an ordinary Russian, apart from inflating your national pride.
Russians would be better off, if they could stamp out the ubiquitous corruption that has enriched oligarchs and politicians, while impoverishing the people.
Why have the former Soviet territories all prospered, in comparison?
The Russians living there show no desire to return to Russia, in spite of financial enticements.
russiancitizen17 Sep 2017 06:52
i am a russian citizen and i support putin,
because by historical standards his rule was very beneficial to russia.

yes, many things could have been better,
BUT... BUT it might also have been much worse

thus, as the best is the enemy of good, i support putin

putin more than doubled russia's gold reserve,
defeated wahhabists in chechnya, georgians in ossetia, returned crimea, and is helping president assad to protect syria from bearded troglodytes

Loe kõiki kommentaare (2)

Arvamus
SÜNDMUSED LÄHIAJAL

Vaata veel ...

Lisa uus sündmus