Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
Autor on vaid tõlkinud kuulujutte.
"If it could be proved that figures had been deliberately altered to give a specific result then it would be very serious, but so far no evidence has emerged from these Climatic Research Unit (CRU) emails of any error in the HadCRUT instrumental temperature record at the centre of the row, never mind proof of deliberate intent to mislead.
How often have you heard that repeated, clearly, by the mainstream press reporting on this incident?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...
"If it could be proved that figures had been deliberately altered to give a specific result then it would be very serious, but so far no evidence has emerged from these Climatic Research Unit (CRU) emails of any error in the HadCRUT instrumental temperature record at the centre of the row, never mind proof of deliberate intent to mislead.
How often have you heard that repeated, clearly, by the mainstream press reporting on this incident?"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/comm...
0
0
0
0Facts are facts. Misinterpretation of facts does not make the facts wrong.
0
0Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Suits (07:55)
"Facts are facts. Misinterpretation of facts does not make the facts wrong."
so what are the facts? ... and how can proper conclusions be achieved on misrepresented information ?
so what are the facts? ... and how can proper conclusions be achieved on misrepresented information ?
0
0Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: hmmmmm (09:44)
0
0Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Suits (07:55), Suits (06:23)
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.
